Obama administration revises Medicare rules for coordinated care
By N.C. Aizenman, October 21, 2011
The Obama administration on Thursday substantially
revised the rules of a program under the 2010 health-care law aimed at
encouraging doctors and hospitals to coordinate care. The final regulations
grant medical providers far more
flexibility than a draft proposal released
in March.
The move was greeted with jubilation by groups representing doctors and
hospitals. But organizations
for insurers and employers complained that the administrationfs concessions
increased the likelihood that providers will consolidate, reducing competition
and driving up prices.
The program directs Medicare to offer financial incentives for medical
providers to band together in gaccountable care organizations,h or ACOs, which
handle care for patients across a full range of settings, including primary-care
and specialist offices, hospitals, and nursing facilities.
Advocates maintain it could set an example that prompts private insurers and
employers to enter into similar arrangements, transforming the way care is
delivered in the United States.
In the current gfee for serviceh system, providers are individually
compensated for each procedure they order — effectively incentivizing them to
pick the costliest approach.
The hope is that by coordinating care, ACOs will improve quality and
efficiency — enabling them to charge Medicare less. Medicare would then share
the savings with the ACOs. Obama officials estimated the program would reduce
Medicare spending by up to $940 million over four years.
To ensure that ACOs do not stint on care, they will have to meet detailed
quality standards in four areas: patient experience, care coordination and
patient safety, preventive health care, and care for at-risk populations.
Medicare beneficiaries whose doctors join an ACO are not obligated to remain
with the doctor. Similarly, providers in an ACO cannot limit patientsf access to
other health-care professionals or hospitals that participate in Medicare but do
not belong to the ACO.
Among the changes to the rules was the administrationfs decision to slash the
number of quality measures that ACOs must meet from 65 to 33.
gThis was enormously helpful,h said Linda Fishman, a senior vice president at
the American Hospital Association. gEven large organizations . . .
said that 65 quality measures was far too many.h
Obama officials have also adjusted the formula for calculating the proportion
of savings that ACOs can keep in order to give them a greater share.
Perhaps most significantly, the administration scrapped a requirement that
ACOs take the hit if their costs exceeded government targets. That would have
been a deterrent to providers with little experience working as part of a
coordinated team, said George H. Roman, senior director of health policy for the
American Medical Group Association.
gWhy would they enter into a voluntary arrangement that puts them at
financial risk if they can be guaranteed payment by sticking with the
conventional system?h he said.
Under the revised rules, ACOs can insulate themselves from that risk in
exchange for taking a smaller portion of savings they generate.
Like other representatives of providers, Roman said it was too soon to
predict whether the modified rules would spur large numbers of providers to form
ACOs.
But he said he was pleasantly surprised at the administrationfs
responsiveness to the industryfs critiques. gThey clearly heeded what people
said, and itfs a big step in the right direction.h
© The Washington Post Company